You will have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Can anyone verify whether the gap displayed along the top of the engine cowling is normal?
I would say it looks about right.
The hinge is a type of cast bracket with a pip pin hole on either side and it needs room to hinge up, thus if the gap was completely closed the cowl might not be able to swing up — that's if my ole memory is correct, for it's been a while.
I will look for some Vought Photo's. I do have a beautiful large picture on 341 s/n 1003 - Voughts 1st 341 over the grand canyon at sunset, its just a silhouette. 1003 was also the one Jake Hart had the mid air in years later I believe. I have to be careful I don't get mixed-up between those s/ns and the 1st 350 serial numbers! D. Dunstan
not seconded but owned by QinetiQ and maintained on the military register. They bought 12 surplus AH1 to use as spares and attrition loss replacements - currently 4 flying ac.
They seem to operate Gazelle helicopters as ETPS (Empire Test Pilots School) and RWTES (Rotary Wing Test & Evaluation Squadron)
The fleet seems to have been:-
XX372 now at Bourne Park
XX435 stripped for spares at Boscombe Down
XX449 RWTES
XX453 RWTES
XZ308 for spares use at Boscombe Down
XZ936 Accident 2.6.14 and stored at Boscombe Down
XZ939 ETPS
ZB625 ETPS
I am reposting Elipix's 'Griffair Gazelles' as the original post came at the end of the previous page and some may have therefore missed this - plus, this serves as a great opportunity to take another peek at Elipix's photos!
Just to recap, we posted a 'lone Gazelle' a couple of weeks back (G-RIFF) but Elipix uncovered a total of three UK-registered Griffair Gazelles plus a fourth on the Yugo reg, YU-HDL!
This craft was previously owned by Specialist flying training and registered as G-BLAN which was bought by SFT in 1983.
G-RIFA was originally G-BBHU which was registered to Westland in 1973 and is also an ex-SFT bird having been bought by them in 1985.
G-RIFC yes, you guessed it, she is also an ex-SFT bird, originally registered as G-SFTD in 1982.
Once again, our great thanks to Elipix for uncovering these photos and associated details.
Manufacturer(s): Sud Aviation, Aérospatiale.
Applicability: SA 341 G and SA 342 J helicopters, all manufacturer serial numbers.
Reason: Two cases have been reported of failure of a landing gear rear cross-tube on SA 341 and SA 342 type helicopters during maintenance and towing operations. These failures caused the helicopters to drop or tip over. Analysis revealed that an excessive hardness of the cross-tube material, combined with inter-granular corrosion initiation, may affect the structural integrity of the rear cross-tube.
This condition, if not detected and corrected, could lead to failure of a cross-tube, leading to dropping or tipping over of the helicopter, possibly resulting in injury to occupants or people on the ground.
To address this potential unsafe condition, Airbus Helicopters (AH) issued Alert Service Bulletin (ASB) n°SA341/342-32.08 providing instructions for inspecting the hardness of the landing gear rear cross-tube and replacing non-conforming rear cross-tubes.
Required Action(s) and Compliance Time(s):
Required as indicated, unless accomplished previously:
Note 1: The landing gear rear cross-tubes affected by this AD are identified by Part Number (P/N) 341A415201.00 or P/N 341A415201.01.
(1) Within 5 flight hours after the effective date of this AD, determine the P/N of the landing gear rear cross-tube installed on the helicopter. A maintenance records check is acceptable to make this determination, provided those records can be relied upon for that purpose.
(2) If, during the identification as required by paragraph (1) of this AD, it is determined that an affected P/N rear cross-tube (see Note 1 of this AD) is installed on the helicopter, before next flight, install a limitation placard on the instrument panel, in full view of the pilots , as shown in Table 1 of this AD, in accordance with the instructions of AH ASB n° SA341/342-32.08, amend the applicable Rotorcraft Flight Manual (RFM) to incorporate the same limitation, inform all flight crews and, thereafter, operate the helicopter accordingly.
Table 1 – Limitation Placard
AUTOROTATION TRAINING FLIGHTS ARE PROHIBITED
Inserting a copy of this AD into the applicable RFM is an acceptable method to comply with the RFM change required by paragraph (2) of this AD.
To read the remainder of this AD, including additional conditions, click on the link below.
YU-HDL did briefly wear the marks 4O-HJS (pictures have been on Aviafora before). It was for sale through SKYDOCK a company owned by Richard Briggs. He has had many helicopters, mainly Hughes 500s.
The trail has gone cold on this machine, the website www.skydock.co.uk shows it as sold... anyone know who to ?
Richard sold this aircraft, I believe to someone from Russia. Although the markings were painted on her fuselage, 4O-HJS was never actually registered with these numbers, so she was never therefore de-registered. Griffair operated this aircraft but did not own it. She was sold by her owner to Richard Briggs through auction.
As Elipix mentioned, I think this may have cropped-up before. Tis' sometimes difficult to remember all the issues we discuss, but thanks for the clarification Steve.
Gazelle owners/operators, you need to act on this directive. I've just inspected one of mine and found a great big crack in it!
However, trying to find the part number is not altogether straightforward. On some aircraft it is etched by hand on the end face, while on others it is painted/printed on the round section. Does anyone know of any other places to look?
The one I've just inspected is definitely for the scrap bin!
If you can't see the number (which will be the case for most) you will end up carrying out a hardness test to tell if you have a .00 or .01 fitted. I believe this does not affect .02 or .03 part numbers which were used after 1976. If I had a post 'issue' cross tube I would just fit it, I think this gets rid of the 'issue'.
If you can't see the number (which will be the case for most) you will end up carrying out a hardness test to tell if you have a .00 or .01 fitted. I believe this does not affect .02 or .03 part numbers which were used after 1976. If I had a post 'issue' cross tube I would just fit it, I think this gets rid of the 'issue'.
I would agree with that, but I just wondered if mine was a .02 or a .03 which had failed, as this helicopter is later than 1976 and should be fitted with .02 or .03 tubes.
Just a guess, but i feel there may be a requirement coming to check other part numbers/cross tubes shortly as there seems to be some confusion and a lack of obvious part number marking, i don't think the MoD did any additional checks on the landing gear, they may have reduced the time between servicing themselves.
can I ask which ac was cracked? the directive has been reissued to include -02 after QinetiQ had an -02 fail the hardness check. AH's assumption that all ac built after 1976 would have -02 or -03 fitted is ludicrous (they can't tell us how many -00 or -01 we had in stock) and the hardness test is seriously flawed.
Zishelix enquired about seeing the new branding which I've added to HA-LFH, so I've posted some photos below.
This branding shows the HAELO logo which represents a charity of mine. This arrangement is temporary however, as I plan to repaint the aircraft later in the year.
Adrian
Here are a few more stills from when the branding was added:
Indeed it is. It is in fact one of the distinguishing features of the stretched Gazelle (as indicated by the (S) designation after the model number in the above photo). The other feature is of course the distance between the rear passenger window and the fuselage seam where the rear door hinges are mounted (although this is less obvious unless you are up close).
I have yet to hear an explanation as to why the stretched versions lack the standard vertical stabilisers. Hopefully we shall find out.
From some photos I have seen they look like they are not being use for spares ! One of them has been stripped down to bare metal ? So more to keep a look out for in the future.
Joswrote: What I have learned recently is that the Arab serials should be read left to right (I know, it sounds crazy, given that they write right to left). Having said that, the serial thus is 3407, which fits in the sequence of known serials like 3405 (c/n 1496) and 3406.
Zis, it seems as if Jos has resolved the registration 'mystery'.
Miscellaneous Gaz
YU-HPZ with accessories
Gaz Patch for Zis!
T/R Driveshaft Clearance
The driveshaft seems to pass reasonably close to the oil cooler pipe? In fact the clearances all round seem to be fairly limited. I suppose this is why some aircraft experience chaffing on the inside of the t/r driveshaft cover?
We've posted a couple shots now of this Gaz, and here she is again, but from a new perspective. Will probably post a 'N2TV Compilation' in the near future.
SA341G(S) N2TV (cn 1392) in flight in the United States c. 1990's
In 2000 this craft became a Yorkshire-based-bird flying as G-BZLA. She is still in the UK, now flying as HA-PJB and lives near Gatwick Airport.
Note the interesting combination of a missing front skid fairing while the rear fairing remains installed.
I have been shown a poor quality picture of c/n 1087, apparently taken before delivery as F-BVEI to Electricité de France. The registration on the lower fuselage definitely seems to read F-MTZR. This is not logical however as test registrations for civil helicopters normally start with F-W (F-M is reserved as call signs for the military).
In a database of a well-respected expert in Aerospatiale/Eurocopter/Airbus Helicopters, F-WMTZ is mentioned as the test registration. Maybe F-MTZR was applied for a special occasion. Does anyone have any more information?
Jos, I'm glad you are asking about this, for I also noticed the unusual F-M registration which was applied on s/n 1087. Sadly, I couldn't find out any more about it.
Hopefully this and other 'mysteries' we have about Gazelle production & service history will be solved when our French friends discover Aviafora!
Elipix, if these Ecuadorian Gazelles are not on the SA register, do you think they are being used for spare parts?
They are all being overhauled. Some owners bought 2, one will definitely fly, the other may take a lot longer. I will be seeing their progress in a few weeks in SA. Sorry no photos.
Grazie Steve. I think earlier comments on the thread indicated that these craft were not in the best of shape. Hopefully the mechanics there can put them in working order.
I've not been able to find anything (yet) as to who originally made this but .. I wouldn't be overly concerned about the design rights as one can very easily make one's own design based on the overall concept, and as soon as you modify the design .. it becomes yours (in terms of copyright). I can think of a couple of improvements, such as a rotor shaft, incorporating the fenestron and adding the undercarriage. The first 'E' could also be modified to display the exhaust.
Comment